Waterloo - testimony first

This famous battle with an inglorious end for the former master of Europe took place more than 200 years ago, near the hitherto unknown Belgian village of Waterloo, approximately 1000 km from Prague. It became a worldwide synonym for every major defeat, or for the final act of fundamental importance, which affected many subsequent events with its negative consequences.

Similarly, like the battle at that town, ours, on November 2, 2021 at the District Court for Prague 10, had two unplanned stages. As with Napoleon, who counted on only one highly successful battle that day, our battle, originally planned by Judge #JH ("Dr. Hustá") as a single trial, turned into an unsuccessful two-part court session lasting several hours for us.

But what were the forces?

In both of these historical events, the forces were numerically equal, even though the opposite part was represented in both cases by a united opposition. The trio of Englishmen, Prussians and Dutchmen was against him, and against us - the well-known trio of the righteous. In the role of second, it was #JH ("Dr. Hustá") in her well-fitting "bathrobe" there on the defendant's side #MV ("Mgr. Prasátko") sprawled out comfortably and confidently in a well-fitting jacket by Blažek and in the public area, #LA ("Dr. Leklá Andělka") watched this whole court rumble with her typical mysterious smile.

To see into their heads like that - it occurred to me then. Just like the famous Frenchman, too, when his whole tactic collapsed like a house of cards in the afternoon .

But there were others, either physically present or in the background and invisible, pulling the right strings with their own care, and without whom both of these "theatres" would not have the right tone. In the end, it was they who, in the name of establishing all-embracing goodness and justice, improved it in their own image and sanctified it with the Judas penny.

Let historians evaluate historical events. We can't do anything about it today anyway, and it's beyond our power to influence them in any way. Therefore, let's focus more on the description of the events that I personally experienced at the beginning of November 2021, and which will remain in my head until the gentleman with the strange German name stops for them.

As has been written many times in our previous posts – we met directly and indirectly with Radio ГA / ГA quite often. For the second year already, I tried to clear my name, neatly wrapped in a tarnished reputation, against his "top" with lawsuits "for the invalidity of the resignation" and "against discrimination and unequal treatment".

Our last court session together, which I described in my previous posts here and here as a "cabaret", was soon to be artistically transformed into something higher - a court "farce".

During the September cabaret, the judge announced to us during the court hearing that our petition against her bias was "unexpectedly" rejected by the superior Municipal Court with unexpected turbo-speed in only 4 days, and so, in order to decide on both matters, she now feels as the most responsible.

So how did it look for me on this day?

In the matter of discrimination, I still did not have a chance to present my claim, I have not yet personally participated in any hearing in this matter, and I was informed at the court scheduled on 2 November 2021 she even does not need to be there at all.

So we set out on 2/11/2021 for this battle with minimal expectations. Burdened with written materials for the meeting and the necessary computer equipment, we nervously tap-danced in front of the well-known door of courtroom 3.302.

We were already getting to know it intimately there. I was no longer surprised to see my name on the list of all the unfortunates on the door of the courtroom, where exactly one half believes that the other half is going to do it to the other half as soon as the damn door opens.

I thought it would be funny to scratch with a key to the worktop behind the door, where I was so disliked sitting, the all-telling diamond message for future generations - "that I did not like to sit here and wait in vain for justice from the judge".

Suddenly we noticed a middle-aged woman circling the labyrinth of corridors here, visibly looking for something or someone. In the hope that my fate is not indifferent to some other sympathiser of mine, we offered her to help. We were struck by the Slovak accent in her Czech speech and, as is usual in such similar situations, we spoke fluently in Slovak to her.

There was no doubt. An interpreter from Czech to Slovak and "vice versa", which #JH ("Dr. Hustá") threatened us during the last cabaret performance.

I thought that someone like that couldn't exist and I had a terrible urge to touch her to see if she was real.

She admitted to us that she thought it was a prank too, but you know - "money doesn't stink". And that's how she accepted this invitation to my interpretation. She says that she normally interprets in Hungarian, as she comes from Southern Slovakia, but this will be her premiere.

Ours too, I wanted to tell her, if the lawyer of the opposite party #MV ("Mgr. Prasátko") had not entered into our politeness with his familiar "I strongly object!" Even though we didn't notice him in the corridor the whole time, probably thanks to the excellent acoustics of the courthouse in Mičánky, his refined bat-like hearing so similar to the judge, and most importantly - as her good friend on the phone, he revealed our "prepared plot" in time.

So we had to awkwardly say goodbye and spent the rest of the wait before being "admitted" to the hall standing at a minimum distance of 10m from each other. This is just so that justice will be served for this time as well.

Another surprise was waiting for us soon.

When the gong sounded in the corridor and we were admitted with the "anti-covid masks" into the courtroom by the judge, the local court television crew started filming us right from the door. To the internal amusement of the judge, they filmed us non-stop from the beginning of the hearing until its bitter end.

There was no attempt to fully and truthfully document the proceedings. By the fact that the camera lens was always aimed only at us, as can be seen from the picture below, it already spoke in advance about the set objectivity of the upcoming meeting. The piquancy was also the fact that here we were in the role of the plaintiff, while Radio ГА / ГA in the role of the defendant was hiding with its lawyer, well paid by the American taxpayers, on the other side of the camera lens.

Most likely, someone needed to document the progress of the battle and then enjoy their unique triumph with a glass of whisky.

But what, feeling like members of Berdych's gang on the court is not something you experience every day, right?

As the interpreter aptly remarked after the end of the whole farce during our joint phone call "ex post" - that after entering the courtroom "the bias of the court towards us could be cut".

After a few important introductory sentences about knowing who is who and why we are here at all, the judge started again to deal with the language of the proceedings in classic fashion. We were again warned that the trial is taking place in the Czech Republic and that therefore Czech will be used here. That is, I was exempted from this obligation according to the OSŘ ("Civil Court Code"), but my legal representative now had to be properly praised for her courage to represent me.

After we countered that it is not a problem for us to speak Slovak, or even Czech, and that if the honorable court has a problem understanding the Slovak language, or does not understand a word, then let to order an interpreter for herself. The result was the judge slowly started to look out of character.

An awkward scene ensued with haggling over who would pay for these interpreter costs and how much.

Before this meeting, in response to her written notification about the need for an interpreter, we informed her that we definitely do not want to be the one. The lady judge visibly fired her interpretation ammunition and now started to think in the spirit of the well-known judge - "in terms of efficiency and economy". Imagining that she would have to go to "her superior matron" and defend the economy in interpreting from Czech to Slovak and then back to Czech for several hours, she tried to convince the interpreter that it was fine that she showed up for the challenge court for interpretation, but that she could end it now, as at the beginning, and leave "with God" without any interpretation.

Of course, to take it civically and therefore for free. She would actually still have time for a nice November afternoon with the last remnants of light, she would do some shopping, and so on - you could read from the cloud above her head.

All of you who are fed by "free trade" will certainly understand the following arguments of the interpreter, that justice is a nice thing, but it does not make food and does not even pay the bills. Even the lady judge began to think about to whom to throw this decision at all.

Naturally, she was the first to think that we would cut it up.

But thanks to the last few court sessions we went through together, we didn't rush into it at all.

And so she tried to ask us if we would need to translate or not, so that if the answer was no, she could dismiss her with a thank you saying "bye-bye". Since we liked this lady's behaviour from the beginning, we suggested to the judge diplomatically, with the expression of a naive child, that since the interpreter is already here, to be safe, let her stay with us until the end of both hearings in the courtroom. She will actually be ready to translate if the need arises at any time.

Gritting her teeth, she finally had to accept it.

From that moment we knew that today we were on this battlefield only in the role of military observers and extras.

It is not worth giving details of the course of the battle. I just listened to most of it absent-mindedly anyway. Sometimes I was awakened from my lethargy only by her demands on the part of my legal representative and sister in one person, that she should not speak Czech quickly, because she does not have time to type it on the computer keyboard, or that she repeat the Czech sentences again for the same reason.

So let us speak to the "Protocol of the meeting", which this venerable woman made for us in the interval between battles.

---

---

There was also a mention of the previous "pushing", even though the recordings clearly show "bushing".

---

---

It is necessary to add to the above that the judge #JH ("Dr. Hustá") really tried, on behalf of the lawyer of the defendant Radio ГA / ГA #MV ("Mgr. Prasátko"), to offer 5 salaries right at the beginning. However, after the experience of January 2021, it was clear to us that the lawyer does not have the mandate to agree to anything like that, and even during the court proceedings we urged him not to leave it to the judge and to dare to propose something himself. The course of the following minutes fully proved us right. And so, apart from the well-known proposal that he presented on our useless Brno "mediation trip" in June of the same year, we did not learn anything new on this matter.

And so the merciless slaughter continued, mercilessly.

All our claims and evidence were rejected. All of our requests to call witnesses and other evidence were denied. The request for an expert assessment in the field of IT - was also rejected.

---

---

It didn't help nor our evidence that my superior #RC ("Remotely Controlled") with his higher admin rights and #JS ("Joints Smoker") as security director were responsible for the system in addition to me, nor that the system was leaked, which was confirmed to us and the rest of us at one of the meetings by him.

In the end, the argument that O365 administration was neither in my description nor in the job description I signed, which was evidenced by my employment contract from 2004 and its amendment from 2018, did not help either.

I leave without comment the professional ignorance of the judge in the field of administration of the O365 cloud environment and the duties of the administrator of this system, which she once again fit in without blushing on this fateful day when pronouncing the sentence. I will leave without comment the technical nonsense "about the door" and "about the thief" with which like a true ally, #MV ("Mgr. Prasátko") came to her to aid before the verdict was announced, or the nonsense about spreading someone or something on some networks.

I only remember how, in this spirit, they both fed the tired ears of the court public present, with the exception of the judge, bravely fighting with her ever-falling head, when, on the contrary, their wisdom with a touch of conspiracy did not give them a chance to sleep.

If only both of them could at least partially understand "what it's about"!

Možná by je pak napadlo, že odstavovat "cloudovou infrastrukturu" firmy Microsoft z pracovního počítače někde v bohem zapomenuté zemi je stejný nesmysl, jako podobným způsobem se pokoušet stisknout bájné červené tlačítko na stole Vladimíra Putina.

For the technically curious, here is a link to one of my previous articles here.

On the contrary, I was struck by the mention of the existence of an "internal investigation report of the defendant" in this protocol and actually many times before.

This "Mrs. Colombo's wife" has never appeared anywhere, nor have we found it anywhere in the files. About the fact that I would ever be allowed to contribute to it with my imaginary little bit in the mill - for example with my testimony "a la how I saw it and experienced it then", they are always stubbornly silent about it. On the other hand, it made a visible contribution to my statement and to this "Waterloo" of mine.

So who knows the contents of that message? That it would be meant, um, something like belief in the (non)existence of God, something like - "I haven't seen it and yet I believe you have it"?

Its author is without any discussion #RC ("Remotely Controlled"), actually laughing and waving at us with a raised middle finger "from behind a large puddle". But who is or are the others who know its contents? So far, it seems that it is known only to the righteous trio - #LA ("Dr. Leklá Andělka"), #MV ("Mgr. Prasátko") and #JH ("Dr. Hustá"). But who knows?

Perhaps there is a friend by their side who has not yet spoken about this whole case and perhaps even knows where it is kept.

So we will continue in searching further and we will continue to hope that, similar to several times before, we will be successful again in untangling this ball of doubt.

By the way, if any of you know where the mysterious message ends, or God forbid knows its content, then at least give us a hint!

The main prize will be a chocolate "Golden Piggy", which especially in this "before and after Easter period" will be a tasty reminder and appreciation of your good deed!

The fate and outcome of every great battle is decided partly on the battlefield and partly in its melee. However, the meaning and degree of representation of the forces in both such parts of the battle tumult is always different. In this great battle of ours, more precisely in its first part, more was played in that jousting. Therefore, without having secretly recorded recordings from both recesses of court hearings, with the thanks delivered to us by an unknown sympathiser in a mysterious "flash disk", we would not be able to form the correct outlook on the outcome of this first battle, and indeed on all the others.

So, at the end of this post, let's start with a few sentences from an excerpt of the interview, which should have never left the four walls of the "Mičánec" battlefield.

So what forces conspired in the first part of this bitter behind-the-scenes fight?

Soudkyně:	#JH („Dr. Hustá“)
Přísedící:	jedna z přísedících
Mužský hlas:	nikdo neví, nikdo ho nezná, nebo nechce znát

One note about the male voice.

Every time it comes to explaining who he is, there is a deep silence, followed by a forced change of the topic of conversation.

Přísedíci	To si řekla málo razantně, měla si říct, že jednání je skončeno. Nikdo na to nezareagoval a všichni seděli jako pecky.
Soudkyně	Hele, ale ja se fakt snažím. Snažím se na ní koukat. Bohužel dneska nebudu cvičit a já bych to potřebovala jako sůl, a to ve čtyři nestihnu. Tak půjdu večer do divadla.
Přísedíci	Na co jdete?
Soudkyně	S kamarádkou. Nevím (smích). Já jsem ji prostě řekla, že dneska půjdu na cokoliv. To jsem se teď rozhodla, že o diskriminaci žádné důkazy brát nebudu (s posměchem). Což je pro mně nejjednodušší, to by jsme tam byly dál, furt. Že jo, támhle to, to by bylo pořád, co je někde na Internetu,…
Mužský hlas	Hele, byly poučeni u toho prvního jednání?
Soudkyně	No byly, podle mýho…
Mužský hlas	Ale bylo pouze jedno, tak si nejsem moc jistej.
Soudkyně	Hele, pojďte sem (něco ukazuje, muž jen dělá „hm“). A ona se to na to zaměřila po tom prvním. Co se zaměřila na tu mediaci, ... Tady pořád neměla nic (hmmm). Tady furt mele, že jsem ustanovila, já nevím koho.. Tak jsem to já začala psát a pak jsem pochopila, že to je zbytečný... (píše do počítače) Hele, já nevím, jestli jste si všimli, ale ona chvíli připustila, že on to udělal (muž hmmm), ale začala tam cpát jiný věci, …
Mužský hlas	Ale že za to nemůže...
Soudkyně	Že za to nemohl, to je samozřejmé a taky se snažila, že dělal jiné věci dobře a tak dále, jasné... Ale proč...?
Přísedíci	Ale ona dělala furt tu „vyfku“, a taky jestli jich bylo 15, nebo 20...
Soudkyně	No jasně! Hele dle mýho, on měl vzít dohodu a tři platy a nazdar.
Přísedíci	Nebo i těch 5 připouštěli.
Soudkyně	Hele, nepřipouštěli. No jo, protože 3 bylo předtím a já, když on pořád chtěl těch 10, tak jsem na ně zkoušela, jestli by jsme to nevytáhli na těch 5.
Přísedíci	Hele, a proč ona to otočila na vás, že vy nemáte mandát?
Soudkyně	Hele lidi, vždyť ji poslouchejte, s ní je to fakticky hodně obtížný. Co? No prostě... Tak jak to tam máte, přesně. (kontroluje zápis). Hele, koukněte se, kolik času a kolik lidí tady kvůli ní stráví, ... To jsem vám nedávala číst? Předsedkyně, místopředsedkyně, odbory, ministerstva, musí projednávat tu její stížnost, ... To tady mám, pak vám to půjčim (muž se zasmál... a kontrolují zápis a sborově se spolu o něm baví a smějí...)
Přísedíci	Jenom se domluvme, kdy to podepíšem? (...dlouhé psaní do počítače...) (Všichni si tu stížnost čtou a posměšně vykřikují)
Soudkyně	To mně fakt rozesmálo... (…a něco ukazuje)
Obě	Je to vaše vyjádření, ale fakt dobrý, dobrý! Tak to takhle necháme, ne? To se mi za celou dobu, co tady působím, nestalo....
Soudkyně	Já taky přemýšlím, co tady ještě zažiju... (píšou dlouho do počítače) Tady je jeden postup, co mi poslal můj hodný kamarád, je to ústavní nález. Pokud osoba, která se při nákupu služeb cítila diskriminována, tato osoba v soudním řízení musí nejen tvrdit, ale i prokázat, že s ní nebylo zacházeno obvyklým způsobem, tedy neznevýhodňujícím způsobem. Neprokáže-li toto tvrzení, nemůže v řízení uspět. Dále pak musí tvrdit, že znevýhodňujícího zacházení bylo motivováno diskriminací na základě něčeho. Tady mám pracovního... Tuto motivaci ovšem nemusí v případě .... (něco rychle čte a drmolí). No to je jedno. Tady prostě je, že on to musí ... Prokáže-li osoba, že se cítí poškozena .... A já to prostě zkusím dát…
Přísedíci	Co může být bráno jako prokázání diskriminačního jednání?
Soudkyně	Hele, já nevím. Budu dostávat obědy, černoši obědy dostávat nebudou. Takže všem jsem dala poukázky každý rok, prostě Nováková nedostane. Nebo na večírek pozvu všechny ostatní a nepozvu (nějaké jméno)
Přísedíci	My jsme tady měli k diskriminací případ, kdy někdo tvrdil, že mu hodil na stůl banánovou slupku.
Soudkyně	Jo, to jsme tady měli, a taky to prohrál! (posměšně se smíchem)
Přísedíci	Jo, ale neuznala jste to jako důkaz... Co by bylo s tou banánovou slupkou dále?
Soudkyně	To jsme slyšeli toho, a on to pochopitelně popře. To máte složité. On na to kdosi napsal i písničku... Na ten „sexual harashment“, (a zabáva ostatní vysvětlováním o tom co je a co není obtěžováním)
Přísedíci	(uvádí případ psychiatra Cimického, který byl obviněn z obtěžování...
Soudkyně	Počkejte, to já vůbec nevím. (Přísedící popisuje medializovanou kauzu posledních dní)
Soudkyně	​No jasný, to je úplně stejný jak s Kolínským. Najednou všechny obtěžujete, kteří vám přijdou pod nos...
Přísedíci	Jeden se odváží a ostatní se přidaj. Za statečnost a odvahu...

In conclusion, allow us to indicate in "non-Cimrman-like" fashion the topic of one of our other posts and actually answer your logical question in this way - "did you really just keep it to yourself?" We will answer in a roundabout way and politically correct.

Yes, we did not like this unfair battle.

Although it was clear to us that from this point we would most likely only lose all future battles, we tried to additionally invoke justice and ask for the opinion of the most qualified persons on this issue.

Among them were several judicially anointed heads, including those of the minister of justice, and there was also a public defender of rights, supervising the purity of similar court battles by virtue of his position. This entire peloton of "optionally independent" was eventually closed by a well-known Czech investigative journalist, who had mercilessly gone after the throats in of all those unpopular individuals so many times.

So if you want to know their opinion on our initiatives, come here again sometime next time.

That is, if there are any more.