[Hu is hu] in Czech

It all started innocently enough. In the beginning was the word. The word was spoken, followed by an innocent request to delete personal data and it ended with the revocation of consent to the processing of personal data, delivered to Radio ГА / ГA at the hands of their administrator on 11.1.2021. Pursuant to Article 17(2) of the General Data Protection Regulation, I only wanted all available steps and technical measures to be taken to realize my definitive civil right "to be forgotten".

I wanted to be forgotten. For all. And especially for those who liked to use my identity and knowingly harmed me. Humanly and professionally.

But what was easily said it was hard done.

At the end of January 2021, that is, more than a year after I was forced to quit my "dream job" at Radio ГA / ГA, I suddenly discovered that despite the positive processing of my above request, unknown employees of this famous "Institute" appear on the Internet with my identity and when communicating with the state authorities of the Czech Republic. For now they appear in the position of "authorised person" for the administration of PostSignum certificates.

I therefore turned to the supervision center of "Czech Post" with a question that could be aptly characterised by the sloppy English abbreviation "WTF"?

28/1/2021, 17:04

28/1/2021, 17:15

Promptly, request SD6156173 was created in their "Servicedesk" system and I waited, biting my nails, for further developments.

1/2/2021, 12:09

1.2.2021, 20:15

2/2/2021, 9:57

2.2.2021, 20:35

3/2/2021, 3:27 PM

3/2/2021, 21:01

4/2/2021, 9:12

The day I received confirmation of "my oblivion", I thought that I had definitively ceased to exist under my former electronic identity for the venerable Radio ГA / ГA. Now we suddenly find that "comrades somewhere in the flawless system of Radio ГA / ГA made a mistake", so we mentally tuned into the mode of "opening the plugs".

Their first "hack" and takeover of my identity were made by my former supervisor #RC ("Remotely Controlled") (more info here) in February 2020 and it was still being investigated by the police.

It just seemed that assuming alien identities was in Radio ГА / ГA's genes and that it was operating this activity beyond the scope of its mission.

I didn't want someone respectable, preferably from "behind the pool", to show me a long nose thanks to the speed of work of our investigators. Now I was almost certain that this within cleaning will not be swept under the carpet and the responsible manager "by default" will not give a shit about this anymore.

Unfortunately, I was wrong again.

The legal department headed by #LA ("Dr. Leklá Andělka") classically downplayed this misconduct, and what's more, she tried to blame me again for this failure of theirs, for which they are directly responsible with regard to the GDPR policy. Allegedly, by not properly handing over the entrusted documentation, I assisted them in having to impersonate the "network of all networks" for me.

This laughable argument evoked a vivid memory for me of 31/3/2020, when on my last day in their service I asked my HR manager #MS ("Mr. Sushi") by email to at least take over the "chum card" to the Hagibor fortress. The fact that I still don't have an exit letter from him, which she probably alluded to in her arguments to the investigators, is just an insignificant reminder of how human resources were treated here.

Since it is good to "strike the iron while it's hot", we decided not to delay, and to expand our original criminal complaint by this as well.

To put it nicely together, it was about:

• Criminal notification for suspicion of criminal offenzes under Act No. 40/2009 Coll. - Criminal law against the rights to the protection of personality and letter secrecy", which was sent on 20.3.2020 separately by post and where the suspect person was directly my former superior #RC ("Remotely Controlled”)

• Criminal report on an unknown person for suspicion of committing a crime according to „§ 230 of the Criminal Code as Unauthorised access to a computer system and information carrier, according to § 231 of the Criminal Code - measures and storage access device and password to the computer system and other such data, according to § 232 of the Criminal Code - damage to the record in the computer system and on the information carrier and interference with computer equipment due to negligence by a suspected person (persons as an organized group)", which was filed on 8.2. 2021, i.e. almost a year later, independently via the data box and where the suspect person was a legal entity (Radio ГA / ГA), represented by its "statutory officer" #KF ("Kristína Fšetko")

About how it all turned out and how, and especially who was "helped and who was protected", it will be discussed sometime next time and in a separate article.

The incident described above and the way in which the legal department tried to develop from it had the result that I also turned to the "Office for the Protection of Personal Data" (ÚOOÚ) with this case to investigate the misconduct in administrative duties of personal data protection.

After an embarrassed reaction to my initiative, when they first inquired about the result of the police investigation on 1/2/2022 (which I understandably left unanswered), they began with a heavy heart to review the described misconduct themselves.

Since they didn't get an answer from me, they probably asked the source, i.e. the police investigator. How else to explain the response date of 10/03/2022 from "helpers and protectors" (Police) and their appointed intermediary to all criminal filings?

The big disadvantage of police orders is that you only have 3 days to respond. If you miss this deadline, you can take a picture of yourself with your entire criminal complaint and the whole several months of effort and proof is irretrievably gone. Therefore, we immediately used § 143, paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code and filed a complaint, stating that we will provide the details of the complaint by the end of March 2022.

And somehow we are preparing our appeal, we suddenly found out while looking at the files at the "investigator's office" and at the court that for our opposing party, the key document, the "substitute affidavit" #RC ("Remotely Controlled"), it was amended by them separately for the police and separately for the court. The fact that I lost both first-instance courts based on it, of course, did not leave us indifferent. I really did not expect such a development of events in our "monster trial" and in order to put a stop to their artistic creativity with evidence, we sent another criminal report on 30.3.2022 together with the complaint, this time for suspicion of committing a crime according to § 347 par. 1 to 4 of the Criminal Code - obstruction of justice. More about this has been published here.

We were mentally "charged" and believed. What for? What are you really asking? Well, in justice!

And how did it end up? More on that later.

But let's quickly return to the "Personal Data Protection Office".

After several months of investigation they confirmed that Radio ГА / ГA had made a mistake in their role as a personal data administrator, but that it was allegedly their first incident and that measures had already been taken to prevent anything could not repeat something similar in the future, as this famous office on 26/05/2022 ended the investigation.

While reading their final investigation report, a very apt quote from "The Poets" movie came to mind.

Professor	...I give you an excellent one.
Docent	But Professor, he cut something during the autopsy!
Professor	I'm begging you, Sejkora! This will happen to him many more times in his life.

The smiling argument of the legal department that even though I was actually specified in the system as an authorised person, but not using private access data, reading this wisdom raised my mind again. On the contrary, the following fragment of their answer testifies to the fact that we stepped on a hornet's nest.

I hope it doesn't make sense to you and it reminds as the argumentation of a student caught looking at sensitive photos of his classmate under the desk in biology class. It didn't make sense to me either. The only explanation was that this explanatory "administrator's opinion" was adjusted "by someone".

In order to have the necessary number of pages and thereby increase its credibility and seriousness, the following investigator's opinion was added beyond the scope of the initiative for "helpers and protectors" (Police):

The fact that something about the data box, or my personal certificates, was not "even ash" in my original suggestion and it was visibly secondary. Mainly that what was originally pointed out was lost in the answer.

Therefore, let's go to the official website of the Czech Post to the section related to "PostSignum" certificates, specifically of the "authorised person" institute section and there we found this there:

---

• The following personal data is processed for employees of customers and certificate applicants:

For Authorized Persons – especially in the scope of first name, surname, birth name, place of birth, birth number or date of birth, gender, nationality, e-mail address, telephone (they are listed in the "Agreement" for the purpose of mutual communication between the Provider and the Customer within the agreed scope and for the purpose of performing the Services).

---

I believe that an unknown person, having access to a contract signed by me, with my personal data, committed repeated fraudulent behavior towards the Czech Post and the Ministry of the Interior, as its operator, until I was blocked access, which the Police of the Czech Republic, based on the statement of the legal the Radio ГА / ГА department, here in the role of guarantor of credibility, but at the same time in the role of administrator and suspect authority, did not investigate this thoroughly, trivialised the problem, and, moreover, covered it up densely.

But let's briefly go back to what was confirmed by the PostSignum support staff and what was avoided in the investigative report. Would it be an intention, or an exaggerated loyalty to society, which has a patent for the right and untwisted behaviour in this confusing and twisted time?

In the result of my investigation, only the events of 6/4/2020 are mentioned, more precisely, only less than a week after I had to recuse myself with the help of all the "honorable and pure". However, further attempts to log in and unknown activities carried out here after almost a year, i.e. from 21.1.2021 and 29.1.2021, are not investigated and not even mentioned in the final report.

I think it is not normal, unlike everyone "anointed" in this case, if the payroll accountant logs into the PostSignum portal and appears to other state institutions behind Radio ГA / ГA with my name and password.

But I will not enter their conscience.

So, as I have stated many times here - Radio ГA / ГA has always had problems with dates in its godly operation. However, the sad fact for me is that it has never made anything of it.

How did #KF ("Kristína Fšetko") write the other day in February 2020 in response to my first complaint about illegal actions by Radio ГA / ГA against my person? Those sentences could be carved in stone.

“All steps and measures taken against you since December 2019 have been taken in accordance with all applicable laws and other legal regulations of the Czech Republic. We have always acted professionally and with full respect for applicable laws, the internal regulations of the Employer and our high moral standards.”

In order to end this post in the spirit of the previous posts, I continue again with some fiction. But today only partially, so actually about half.

---

Year after year came together and, like then #RC ("Remotely Controlled"), now #LA ("Dr. Leklá Andělka"), in the delegated role of the saviour of Radio ГA / ГA reputation, she leaves the office of her boss #KF ("Kristína Fšetko") in a deep bow. With a nose the colour of brown calico and with a great desire to show her her unconditional devotion again, she heads to her office, still on the same floor with her. She does not want to do the assigned task at all. She holds the stimulus of such the subspecies in her hand who only a year ago was allowed to breathe the air of the universe with her. She still heard "Fix it!" of her boss in her ears.

As time increases and ideas decrease, she decides on an already proven classic.

They're going to create something like an affidavit that worked perfectly in court in the previous two cases of #RC ("Remotely Controlled") and #JS ("Joints Smoker") and believe it will be a "cake again" ". Although the rest of her star team of the righteous also fought in these cases, this will only be for ÚOOÚ and what she writes there, the goblin will never know anyway. She already has all the input data from them, she already knows in advance what exactly the statement is supposed to be about, so what?

There is also mutual sympathy here, because in general - neither the state authorities nor Radio ГA / ГA tolerate quarrelsome people. Just the ideal brand!

She sits down at the keyboard of her machine and in response to their following question - "The office requests the administrator to comment on the matter, in particular to the objected accesses to the PostSignum system with the identity of Mr. XXXXX (me) in the period from 06.04.2020 to 29.1.2021, when he was no longer an employee of the company",

---

in a haze of fog, without blushing, she writes this:

Mr. XXXXX received notice from the employment relationship with the company on January 20, 2020 and his employment relationship ended on March 31, 2020. The company did not find any evidence that during this affected period Mr. XXXXX did not pass the PostSignum service documentation to his direct superior or at least to one of his colleagues in the IT department of Radio ГA / ГA, where Mr. XXXXX worked for a long time. Relatively shortly after the departure of Mr. XXXXX, the mentioned direct supervisor of Mr. XXXXX left Radio ГA / ГA as well. The Radio ГA / ГA was going through a challenging period of several significant internal changes at that time. Unfortunately, for this reason, it is possible that regarding the proper handing over of the agenda of the Czech Post service s.p. PostSignum the Radio ГA / ГA itself forgot to contact Mr. XXXXX. In addition to the fact that Mr. XXXXX did not, according to our information, hand over the PostSignum agenda on his own initiative when he left us, this matter was not dealt with more intensively internally during this period, because coincidentally, none of the users needed any assistance regarding their certificate in that period (and for a relatively longer period after that), and therefore the given "vacuum" was not detected for some time.

As mentioned above, only an authorised persons can enter the PostSignum system, using their work email address, the Contract number and their chosen password. The PostSignum system is therefore not accessed via work email. PostSignum also does not allow direct communication with other entities or users, and does not contain any emails, messages or messages that could be considered private correspondence. According to the information provided by our current authorised person, the authorised person's personal data, which are visible after logging into PostSignum by the authorised person, are their first name, last name and work email.

For internal reasons, especially in an attempt to verify the current functionality status of the PostSignum service, an employee of Radio ГA / ГA attempted to log in to PostSignum on January 21, 2021. The Contract registration number, the work email of Mr. XXXXX, as the last known authorised person, and a password were used for this login, when given data were found in internal documentation. With this login, established by Mr. XXXXX identity we found that he is still listed as an authorised person. We found that direct deletion of Mr. XXXXX from the PostSignum system by Radio ГA / ГA is not possible in this way, and that neither is any other employee Radio ГA / ГA is not managed as a new (or another) authorised person here. After this discovery, the PostSignum system was immediately logged out. Due to the legal proceedings regarding the invalidity of Mr. XXXXX's job status, launched by the initiative of Mr. XXXXX, unfortunately, there has been a certain disruption of mutual relations between Radio ГA / ГA and Mr. XXXXX. For this reason, Radio ГA / ГA did not contact Mr. XXXXXX to verify with him the current status of the authorised person account for the PostSignum service and it tried to solve the situation regarding the status of the authorised person in the PostSignum system as quickly as possible by yourself.

On February 8, 2021, Radio ГA / ГA signed an amendment to the Agreement requesting the deletion of Mr. XXXXX account as an authorised person for PostSignum and at the same time appointing another authorised person in his place, who is the current employee of Radio ГA / ГA. This supplement was sent to "Česká pošta s.p." on February 12, 2021 and subsequently signed by them on February 16, 2021. Thus, on this date, this status was rectified.

With the words "So, that's it", she clicks the "Send" button with her familiar mysterious Mona Lisa smile.

What to add to that? Perhaps just so much that, as at the end of every good fairy tale, the familiar sentence should be heard - "the bell rang and the fairy tale is over".

For all those of you who, either because of age or because of your personal life experiences do not believe in fairy tales, I added the following analysis of the story here:

• The author of this fairy tale showed an amazing ability to manoeuvre in time and facts
  

• Using her high moral standards and thanks to professional procedures, the author of this fable purposefully revealed in January 2021, on the same day as us and based on a response to an inquiry from the Czech Post, an illegality in their system that could result in an incitement "someone" to be investigated for one's wrongdoing
  

• With full respect for applicable laws, and even before our request to block account and before sending a criminal report, she took all measures to invalidate the accesses
  

• In all fairness to her, a week before our disclosure, in cooperation with the Czech Post, she is taking all measures to block this former my account and invalidate its access, and it is just her bad luck that I discovered this in the course of her unprecedented efforts
  

• With her characteristic tenacity and in her attempt to prevent further violations of the law, she repeatedly asks the service operator, i.e. Czech Post, to block the account and repeatedly verifies this status by impersonating me on the "network of networks"
  

• She showed amazing technical skills by having blocked and finally to block my already blocked account on 4/02/2021 at 9:15am, including being able to use credentials from documentation which "I did not pass on my own initiative", as she wrote above
  

• She knows the results of the investigation of everyone in that case, leaving no computer trail, which is so natural for other mortals when moving on the "network of networks", thanks to which she can fully use her huge imagination

At the very end, in order to be at least semi-clear about the "handover - non-handover" of the PostSignum documentation to the responsible hands after my involuntary departure of Radio ГA / ГA, I am attaching a copy of the email conversation with my former IT colleague dated 02/02/2021.

WTF, so who the hell is who"?